Boston Globe: ‘Let go of grudges against Cuba, Iran’


IT IS a truism that nations should not have permanent enemies, but the United States seems to have two: Cuba and Iran. We have been in a state of controlled rage against both of them for as long as most Americans can remember. These dysfunctional relationships have much in common.

Both have persisted far longer than rational self-interest would dictate. Our low-level war with Cuba has lasted 55 years, the one with Iran 35 years. No other countries in the world have been targets of our active enmity for so long.

A second similarity between these two long-lasting feuds is their deep historical roots. Cubans and Iranians nurture passionate nationalism that includes collective memory of traumatic American intervention. In 1898 the United States reneged on its promise to allow Cuban independence after the end of Spanish rule; 61 years later Fidel Castro referred to that betrayal in his first speech as leader of victorious rebels. In Iran, much resentment of the United States can be traced back to our role in deposing the country’s last democratically elected leader, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953.

Cuba and Iran were our clients for many years. Revolutionaries deposed the client regimes and established militantly anti-American rule. To some Americans, this was a betrayal akin to parricide. We tried to undermine the revolutionary regimes, but, despite all our efforts, those regimes survived. This has left a deep sense of frustration that fortifies our resistance to compromise with Cuba or Iran.

Hostility toward both countries is also driven by domestic politics. American presidents ritually kowtow to Cuban exile lobbies in Florida and New Jersey. Pro-Israel lobbies fuel anti-Iran sentiment in Congress. Without this political pressure, the US-Cuba and US-Iran relationships would not be so poisonous.

Another similarity between these two astonishingly durable vendettas is that while successive presidents pursued them mercilessly and at times violently, they also negotiated. The history of US-Iran diplomacy is littered with missed opportunities. When one side seemed ready to talk, the other was not. They misjudged and misunderstood each other. Americans often insisted on concessions that Iranians considered insulting to their sovereignty.

A new book, “Back Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations Between Washington and Havana,” by William M. LeoGrande and Peter Kornbluh, shows that the same patterns have afflicted our diplomacy with Cuba. In its pages we hear President Nixon vowing, “I’m not changing the policy towards Castro as long as I’m alive. That’s absolute. Final. No appeal whatsoever.” Henry Kissinger insists that it was time to “crack the Cubans” with “an invasion or blockade” because “we have to humiliate them.” And Secretary of State Alexander Haig tells President Reagan, “You just give me the word and I’ll turn that [expletive] island into a parking lot.”

Kissinger was incensed by Castro’s intervention in Africa and wanted to “clobber the pipsqueak.” He embraced the classic American view that the United States has rights to intervene abroad that other countries do not have. Castro disagreed. “Perhaps it is idealistic of me, but I never accepted the universal prerogatives of the United States,” he told one American envoy. “I never accepted and never will accept the existence of a different law and different rules.”

While Castro defied the United States by projecting power in Latin American and Africa, Iran did the same in the Middle East. This offended America’s sense of order. It seemed like a challenge to the world’s strategic balance, and, in a sense, it was. Cuba and Iran have refused to act according to American rules. In fact, they have worked relentlessly and, at times, quite violently to undermine American interests around the world. Yet even when the United States was at the peak of conflict with Cuba and Iran, the enemies were in touch through elaborate back-channel talks.

No breakthrough ever came. “Small successes do not necessarily lead to big ones,” the authors of “Back Channel to Cuba” conclude. “The incremental approach to normalization has not worked.”

The same could be said about our tortured half-efforts to reconcile with Iran. Nuclear talks between the two sides are proceeding in an atmosphere of mistrust and domestic political backlash. Even the emergence of a new common enemy, the Islamic State insurgency, does not seem sufficient to break the paradigm of US-Iran hostility.

Our long estrangement from Cuba and Iran cannot be permanent. In fact, these anachronisms offer the prospect of a twin diplomatic breakthrough. President Obama has the tools he needs to undermine the economic embargo on Cuba that is our most outdated foreign policy. He can also take decisive steps to build a new relationship with Iran, which would bring great strategic advantage in the frighteningly turbulent Middle East. These two ancient grudges have lasted too long. Ending them would be a dual triumph that would decisively advance our global interests.

Stephen Kinzer is a visiting fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University. Follow him on Twitter @stephenkinzer.

One Response

  1. Mahmoud Reza Banki
    Mahmoud Reza Banki at | | Reply

    My 665 days in prison – TED video – #RezaStory –

    This is the story of my wrongful imprisonment, the very first attempt to talk about it publicly at TED. In a way I am a casualty of this policy. Sanctions affect Iranian Americans. Is that the intent?

    In 2014 I spoke at TED Week at UCLA Anderson to raise questions about the issues of injustice that directly or indirectly affect every American. I am now sharing my story with you and am asking you to share it with others to raise awareness and spark change:

    TED video Teaser on YouTube (~1min):
    At 6:30am on the morning of January 7, 2010 I was living what seemed like the American Dream. I was fast asleep in my bed in New York City, my girlfriend resting peacefully by my side, shortly before I had to be at my job at McKinsey, the global consulting firm. Life was good. My future looked bright. Minutes later it all changed . . .

    Federal agents burst into my home, slammed me up against a wall and handcuffed me. By 7am, my U.S. citizenship, Princeton PhD, published biotech book, years of hard work and aspiring to be my best—none of it mattered. I was an Iranian accused of breaking the law. Prosecutors claimed I had violated trade sanctions with Iran by accepting money from my family to purchase a home. After interrogation, I was shackled into isolation; instead of sitting in my office in my suit, I was sitting on a metal bunk bed in an orange jumper in maximum security isolation. Bail was denied. It seemed as if I was presumed guilty until I could prove innocence.

    Two tough years in prison plunged me into my darkest hours, weeks and months.

    665 days after my arrest I won on appeal and was released from prison. But my battle to get my life back had only begun.

    I tried to put my life back together. I graduated from the MBA program at UCLA Anderson. I applied for jobs relentlessly. Interviews came and went… seasons changed. Yet, despite my qualifications and the final appellate decision in my favor, it seems as if no potential employer can get over my prison story.

    Five years have passed since my arrest and I don’t know how much longer it will take for me to recover professionally and personally. I have two bachelors, two masters, a PhD, and a loving family and wonderfully supportive friends from my 20 years in the U.S. I was accused of a non-violent charge I did not commit and won on appeal. I couldn’t help but wonder why it took 22 months of keeping me in prison. What does justice mean? Couldn’t help but think if it’s this hard for me, how difficult could it be for others who are incarcerated, don’t have opportunities I’ve had, didn’t win on appeal and are trying to reintegrate into society and lead productive lives?

    I am asking you to take 1 minute to watch the TED video teaser below. My full-length video will be released next week on YouTube and the website below. This is a campaign to raise awareness for the need to change and to improve our criminal justice system. I am asking you to share this; let’s raise awareness; let’s spark change.
    I also welcome the opportunity to speak with you and share more of my story.

    TED video Teaser on YouTube (~1min):

    More information about my story:
    M. Reza Banki.PhD.MBA
    @MRezaBanki #RezaStory

Leave a Reply